Equivalent reflectivity factor: Difference between revisions

From Glossary of Meteorology
(Created page with " {{TermHeader}} {{TermSearch}} <div class="termentry"> <div class="term"> == equivalent reflectivity factor == </div> <div class="definition"><div class="short_definiti...")
 
m (Rewrite with Template:Term and clean up)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Term
 
|Display title=equivalent reflectivity factor
{{TermHeader}}
|Definitions={{Definition
{{TermSearch}}
|Num=1
 
|Meaning= The [[radar reflectivity factor]] of a [[target]] consisting of water drops  small compared with the [[radar]] wavelength, which would produce the same [[reflectivity]] as that of  a target with unknown properties.
<div class="termentry">
|Explanation=Mathematically, the equivalent [[radar reflectivity factor]], ''Z''<sub>''e''</sub>, of a given target is defined by  <blockquote>[[File:ams2001glos-Ee57.gif|link=|center|ams2001glos-Ee57]]</blockquote> where &eta; is the reflectivity of the target, &lambda; is the radar [[wavelength]], and 0.93 is the [[dielectric factor]]  appropriate for water. This definition is based on the [[Rayleigh scattering]] approximation, which  requires that the water drops have diameters no larger than about one-tenth the radar wavelength.  For targets consisting of sufficiently small water drops, it follows from the definition that the  reflectivity factor, ''Z'', and ''Z''<sub>''e''</sub> are equivalent. But if the composition and sizes of the [[particles]] are  unknown, it is appropriate to regard the reflectivity factor that is determined from the measured  reflectivity as ''Z''<sub>''e''</sub>. <br/>''See'' [[radar equation]].
  <div class="term">
}}
== equivalent reflectivity factor ==
}}
  </div>
 
<div class="definition"><div class="short_definition"> The [[radar reflectivity factor]] of a [[target]] consisting of water drops  small compared with the [[radar]] wavelength, which would produce the same [[reflectivity]] as that of  a target with unknown properties.</div><br/> <div class="paragraph">Mathematically, the equivalent [[radar reflectivity factor]], ''Z''<sub>''e''</sub>, of a given target is defined by  <div class="display-formula"><blockquote>[[File:ams2001glos-Ee57.gif|link=|center|ams2001glos-Ee57]]</blockquote></div> where &eta; is the reflectivity of the target, &lambda; is the radar [[wavelength]], and 0.93 is the [[dielectric factor]]  appropriate for water. This definition is based on the [[Rayleigh scattering]] approximation, which  requires that the water drops have diameters no larger than about one-tenth the radar wavelength.  For targets consisting of sufficiently small water drops, it follows from the definition that the  reflectivity factor, ''Z'', and ''Z''<sub>''e''</sub> are equivalent. But if the composition and sizes of the [[particles]] are  unknown, it is appropriate to regard the reflectivity factor that is determined from the measured  reflectivity as ''Z''<sub>''e''</sub>. <br/>''See'' [[radar equation]].</div><br/> </div>
</div>
 
{{TermIndex}}
{{TermFooter}}
 
[[Category:Terms_E]]

Latest revision as of 08:14, 29 March 2024

The radar reflectivity factor of a target consisting of water drops small compared with the radar wavelength, which would produce the same reflectivity as that of a target with unknown properties.
Mathematically, the equivalent radar reflectivity factor, Ze, of a given target is defined by
ams2001glos-Ee57
where η is the reflectivity of the target, λ is the radar wavelength, and 0.93 is the dielectric factor appropriate for water. This definition is based on the Rayleigh scattering approximation, which requires that the water drops have diameters no larger than about one-tenth the radar wavelength. For targets consisting of sufficiently small water drops, it follows from the definition that the reflectivity factor, Z, and Ze are equivalent. But if the composition and sizes of the particles are unknown, it is appropriate to regard the reflectivity factor that is determined from the measured reflectivity as Ze.
See radar equation.
Copyright 2024 American Meteorological Society (AMS). For permission to reuse any portion of this work, please contact permissions@ametsoc.org. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be “fair use” under Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act (17 U.S. Code § 107) or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S.Copyright Act (17 USC § 108) does not require AMS’s permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form, such as on a website or in a searchable database, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statement, require written permission or a license from AMS. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policy statement.